Una historia de paralaje conceptual. Un estudio sobre la influencia mutua entre las obras de Wundt y Freud
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Wilhelm Wundt y Sigmund Freud son los fundadores del pensamiento psicológico moderno. Para analizar la influencia mutua se utilizó el método del contexto de las citas. Los resultados muestran que la obra de Wundt fue importante para explicar el carácter alucinatorio del sueño. Por otro lado, las citas de Wundt sobre Freud muestran su rechazo a reconocer el inconsciente como una hipótesis válida para explicar cualquier tipo de fenómeno psicológico. En conclusión, el inconsciente freudiano es el exceso de la incapacidad del sistema de Wundt para explicar los fenómenos que exceden el estudio de la conciencia normal
Anderson, Marc H. y Lemken, Russell K. “Citation Context Analysis as a Method for Conducting Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews”. Organizational Research Methods, 2020. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120969905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120969905
Araujo, Saulo De Freitas. Wundt and the Philosophical Foundations of Psychology: A Reappraisal. Cham: Springer, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26636-7
Ardila, Rubén. “La necesidad de unificar la psicología: el paradigma de la síntesis experimental del comportamiento”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, núm. 12 (2003): 28-37.
Assoun-Laurent, Paul. Introducción a la epistemología freudiana. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores, 1981.
Bernfeld, Siegfried. “Freud’s Earliest Theories and the School of Helmholtz”. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 13 (1944): 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1944.11925576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1944.11925576
Boring, Edwing. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: The Century CO, 1929.
Biehler, Johannes. “Freud et les sciences de la nature (Naturwissenschaften)”. Wißbegierde et structuration psychique, Section I et II, 2006: s.p.
Blumenthal, Arthur. “Wilhelm Wundt: Psychology as the propaedeutic Science”. En Claude E. Buxton (ed.), Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology, 19-47. Florida: Academic Press, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-148510-8.50006-0
Boruttau, Heinrich. Emil du Bois-Reymond. Leipzig: Rikola Verlag, 1922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9818-6
Bringmann, Wolfgang G. “Wundt in Heidelberg: 1845-1874”. Canadian Psychological Review 16, num. 2 (1975): 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081795
Busacchi, Vinicio. “Lacan’s Epistemic Role in Ricœur's Re-Reading of Freud”. Ricoeur Studies/Etudes Ricoeuriennes 7, núm. 1 (2016): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2016.352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2016.352
Danziger, Kurt. “Wilhelm Wundt and the Emergence of Experimental Psychology”. En R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie y M. J. S. Hodge (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science, 396-409. London & New York: Routledge, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070818-31
Diamond, Solomon. “Wundt before Leipzig”. En R. W. Rieber., D. K. Robinson (eds.), Wilhelm Wundt in History. Path in Psychology, 1-68. Boston: Springer, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0665-2_1
Erlingsson, Steindór J. “From Haeckelian Monist to Anti-haeckelian Vitalist: The Transformation of the Icelandic Naturalist Thorvaldur Thoroddsen (1855–1921)”. Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2002): 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021115027965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021115027965
Fierro, Catriel, y Saulo Araujo de Freitas. “A Case for a Philosophical History of Psychology: An Interview with Saulo de Freitas Araujo at the Centenary of the Death of Wilhelm Wundt”. Human Arenas, núm. 4. (2021): 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00165-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00165-z
Fink, Karl J. “Actio in Distans, Repulsion, Attraction: The Origin of an Eighteenth Century Fiction”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 25, núm. 1 (1982): 69-87.
Fortineau, Elisabeth. “Bernheim face à Charcot et Freud. L’École de Nancy”. L’Information Psychiatrique 61, núm. 3 (1985): 413-420.
Freud, Sigmund. “The Interpretation of Dream (First part)”. En SE 4, 1-338, 1900.
Freud, Sigmund. “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life”. En SE 6, 1-239, 1901.
Freud, Sigmund. “Psycho-analysis and the Establishment of the Facts in Legal Proceedings”. En SE 9, 97-114, 1906.
Freud, Sigmund. “Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-year-old Boy”. En SE 10, 3-148, 1909.
Freud, Sigmund. “Totem and Taboo”. En SE 13, 1-162, 1913.
Freud, Sigmund. “The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement”. En SE, 14, 1-66, 1914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10934-001
Freud, Sigmund. “Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis”. En SE, 15, 1-483, 1916-1917 [1915-1917].
Freud, Sigmund. “An Autobiographical Study”. En SE, 20, 3-71, 1925.
Freud, Sigmund. “Project for a Scientific Psychology”, En SE, 1, pp. 283-397, 1950 [1895].
Freud, Sigmund. The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887-1904. London: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Freud, Sigmund. “An Outline of Psycho-analysis”. En SE, 23, 141-205, 1940[1938].
Freud, Sigmund, y Georg Groddeck. “Correspondance (1917-1934)”. The Mental Illness, 31-108, 1988.
Green, Christopher D. “Why Psychology isn’t Unified, and Probably Never Will Be”. Review of General Psychology 19, núm. 3. (2015): 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000051
Greenwood, John. “Wundt, Völkerpsychologie, and Experimental Social Psychology”. History of Psychology 6, núm. 1. (2003): 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.6.1.70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.6.1.70
Grünbaum, Adolf. “Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung von die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse: Eine philosophische Kritik”. En Adolf Grünbaum (ed.), Kritische Betrachtungen zur Psychoanalyse Adolf Grünbaums “Grundlagen” in der Diskussion, 3-34. Budapest, Springer, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75695-5_1
Haberman, Jhon Victor. “A Criticism of Psychoanalysis”. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology 9, núm. 4. (1914): 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070291
Jones, Ernest. Vida y obra de Sigmund Freud. Tomo I. Barcelona: Anagrama, 1981.
Jovanovic, Gordana. “A Revival of Wundt’s Heritage: Searching for the Philosophical Foundations of Psychology from an Historical Perspective”. Theory & Pscyhology 28, núm. 6. (2018): 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318763116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318763116
Jung, Carl. “The Huston Films [1957]”. En William Mcguire y R. F. C Hull (eds.), C. G. Jung Speaking. Interviewers and Encounters, 276-352. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.
Lemm, Vanessa. “Deconstructing the Human: Ludwig Binswanger on Homo Natura in Nietzsche and Freud”. En Daniel Conway (ed.), Nietzsche an the Antichrist. Religion, Politics and culture in Late Modernity, 205-228. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.
Myers, Frederic W. H. “Wundt on Hypnotism and Suggestion”. Mind 2 (1893): 95-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/II.5.95
Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy. An Essay on Interpretation. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press, 1970.
Robinson, David Kent. Wilhelm Wundt and the Establishment of Experimental Psychology, 1875–1914: The Context of a New Field of Scientific Research. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, 1987.
Roudinesco, Élisabeth. Freud en su tiempo y en el. Madrid: Debate, 2014.
Simonsz, H. J. “Johannes Peter Müller’s First Description of the Relation Between Accommodation and Vergence, and of Accommodative Esotropia in 1826”. Strabismus 18, núm. 1. (2010): 1-2. https://doi: 10.3109/09273971003627310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09273971003627310
Stadler, Christian. “Aufstellungsarbeit von Träumen”. En C. Stadler y B. Kress (eds.), Praxishandbuch Aufstellungsarbeit. Grundlagen, Methodik und Anwendungsgebiete, 461-475. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17516-0_27
Stanley-Hall, Granville. “Letter to Freud, 4 November 1909”. En Sigmund Freud Papers: General Correspondence, 1871-1996; Hall, G. Stanley; Originals and miscellaneous photocopies, 1908-1913, 1909. https://bit.ly/3lcWwJE.
Stanley-Hall, Granville. “The Message of the Zeitgeist”. The Scientific Monthly 13, núm. 2 (1921): 106-116.
Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich. “Istoricheskii smysl krizisa v psikhologii”. Sobranie sochienlli (1927).
Wassmann, Claudia. “Physiological Optics, Cognition and Emotion: A Novel Look at the Early Work of Wilhelm Wundt”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 64 (2009): 213-249. https://doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrn058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrn058
Weneger, Mai. “Der psychophysische parrallelismus”. NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 17 (2009): 277-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-009-0344-3
Wundt, Wilhelm. Physikalischen Axiome un Ihre Beziehung zum Causalprincip. Erlangen: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, 1866.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundzüe der Physiologischen Psychologie, Leipzig, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1874.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Hipnotismus und Suggestion. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1892.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Lectures on Human and Animal Psychology. Leipzig: Swan Sonneschein & Co, 1894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12937-010
Wundt, Wilhelm. Völkerpsychologie Vol. 1. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1900.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Outlines of Psychology. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1902.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte [Folk Psychology. An Investigation of the Developmental Laws of Language, Myth, and Cutom]. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1906.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie Band I (6. Aufl.) [Basic Principles of Physiological Psychology Volume I (6th ed.)]. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1908.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie Band III (6. Aufl.) [Basic Principles of Physiological Psychology Volume III (6th ed.)]. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1911.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundriss der Psychologie (15. Aufl.) [Outlines of Psychology (15th ed.)]. Leipzig: Alfred Kröner Verlag, 1922.
Žižek, Slavoj. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock). London y New York: Verso, 1992.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Parallax View (Short Circuits). Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5231.001.0001
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Wilhelm Wundt y Sigmund Freud son los fundadores del pensamiento psicológico moderno. Para analizar la influencia mutua se utilizó el método del contexto de las citas. Los resultados muestran que la obra de Wundt fue importante para explicar el carácter alucinatorio del sueño. Por otro lado, las citas de Wundt sobre Freud muestran su rechazo a reconocer el inconsciente como una hipótesis válida para explicar cualquier tipo de fenómeno psicológico. En conclusión, el inconsciente freudiano es el exceso de la incapacidad del sistema de Wundt para explicar los fenómenos que exceden el estudio de la conciencia normal
Anderson, Marc H. y Lemken, Russell K. “Citation Context Analysis as a Method for Conducting Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews”. Organizational Research Methods, 2020. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120969905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120969905
Araujo, Saulo De Freitas. Wundt and the Philosophical Foundations of Psychology: A Reappraisal. Cham: Springer, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26636-7
Ardila, Rubén. “La necesidad de unificar la psicología: el paradigma de la síntesis experimental del comportamiento”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, núm. 12 (2003): 28-37.
Assoun-Laurent, Paul. Introducción a la epistemología freudiana. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores, 1981.
Bernfeld, Siegfried. “Freud’s Earliest Theories and the School of Helmholtz”. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 13 (1944): 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1944.11925576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1944.11925576
Boring, Edwing. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: The Century CO, 1929.
Biehler, Johannes. “Freud et les sciences de la nature (Naturwissenschaften)”. Wißbegierde et structuration psychique, Section I et II, 2006: s.p.
Blumenthal, Arthur. “Wilhelm Wundt: Psychology as the propaedeutic Science”. En Claude E. Buxton (ed.), Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology, 19-47. Florida: Academic Press, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-148510-8.50006-0
Boruttau, Heinrich. Emil du Bois-Reymond. Leipzig: Rikola Verlag, 1922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9818-6
Bringmann, Wolfgang G. “Wundt in Heidelberg: 1845-1874”. Canadian Psychological Review 16, num. 2 (1975): 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081795
Busacchi, Vinicio. “Lacan’s Epistemic Role in Ricœur's Re-Reading of Freud”. Ricoeur Studies/Etudes Ricoeuriennes 7, núm. 1 (2016): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2016.352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2016.352
Danziger, Kurt. “Wilhelm Wundt and the Emergence of Experimental Psychology”. En R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie y M. J. S. Hodge (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science, 396-409. London & New York: Routledge, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070818-31
Diamond, Solomon. “Wundt before Leipzig”. En R. W. Rieber., D. K. Robinson (eds.), Wilhelm Wundt in History. Path in Psychology, 1-68. Boston: Springer, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0665-2_1
Erlingsson, Steindór J. “From Haeckelian Monist to Anti-haeckelian Vitalist: The Transformation of the Icelandic Naturalist Thorvaldur Thoroddsen (1855–1921)”. Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2002): 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021115027965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021115027965
Fierro, Catriel, y Saulo Araujo de Freitas. “A Case for a Philosophical History of Psychology: An Interview with Saulo de Freitas Araujo at the Centenary of the Death of Wilhelm Wundt”. Human Arenas, núm. 4. (2021): 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00165-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00165-z
Fink, Karl J. “Actio in Distans, Repulsion, Attraction: The Origin of an Eighteenth Century Fiction”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 25, núm. 1 (1982): 69-87.
Fortineau, Elisabeth. “Bernheim face à Charcot et Freud. L’École de Nancy”. L’Information Psychiatrique 61, núm. 3 (1985): 413-420.
Freud, Sigmund. “The Interpretation of Dream (First part)”. En SE 4, 1-338, 1900.
Freud, Sigmund. “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life”. En SE 6, 1-239, 1901.
Freud, Sigmund. “Psycho-analysis and the Establishment of the Facts in Legal Proceedings”. En SE 9, 97-114, 1906.
Freud, Sigmund. “Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-year-old Boy”. En SE 10, 3-148, 1909.
Freud, Sigmund. “Totem and Taboo”. En SE 13, 1-162, 1913.
Freud, Sigmund. “The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement”. En SE, 14, 1-66, 1914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10934-001
Freud, Sigmund. “Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis”. En SE, 15, 1-483, 1916-1917 [1915-1917].
Freud, Sigmund. “An Autobiographical Study”. En SE, 20, 3-71, 1925.
Freud, Sigmund. “Project for a Scientific Psychology”, En SE, 1, pp. 283-397, 1950 [1895].
Freud, Sigmund. The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887-1904. London: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Freud, Sigmund. “An Outline of Psycho-analysis”. En SE, 23, 141-205, 1940[1938].
Freud, Sigmund, y Georg Groddeck. “Correspondance (1917-1934)”. The Mental Illness, 31-108, 1988.
Green, Christopher D. “Why Psychology isn’t Unified, and Probably Never Will Be”. Review of General Psychology 19, núm. 3. (2015): 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000051
Greenwood, John. “Wundt, Völkerpsychologie, and Experimental Social Psychology”. History of Psychology 6, núm. 1. (2003): 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.6.1.70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.6.1.70
Grünbaum, Adolf. “Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung von die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse: Eine philosophische Kritik”. En Adolf Grünbaum (ed.), Kritische Betrachtungen zur Psychoanalyse Adolf Grünbaums “Grundlagen” in der Diskussion, 3-34. Budapest, Springer, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75695-5_1
Haberman, Jhon Victor. “A Criticism of Psychoanalysis”. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology 9, núm. 4. (1914): 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070291
Jones, Ernest. Vida y obra de Sigmund Freud. Tomo I. Barcelona: Anagrama, 1981.
Jovanovic, Gordana. “A Revival of Wundt’s Heritage: Searching for the Philosophical Foundations of Psychology from an Historical Perspective”. Theory & Pscyhology 28, núm. 6. (2018): 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318763116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318763116
Jung, Carl. “The Huston Films [1957]”. En William Mcguire y R. F. C Hull (eds.), C. G. Jung Speaking. Interviewers and Encounters, 276-352. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.
Lemm, Vanessa. “Deconstructing the Human: Ludwig Binswanger on Homo Natura in Nietzsche and Freud”. En Daniel Conway (ed.), Nietzsche an the Antichrist. Religion, Politics and culture in Late Modernity, 205-228. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.
Myers, Frederic W. H. “Wundt on Hypnotism and Suggestion”. Mind 2 (1893): 95-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/II.5.95
Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy. An Essay on Interpretation. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press, 1970.
Robinson, David Kent. Wilhelm Wundt and the Establishment of Experimental Psychology, 1875–1914: The Context of a New Field of Scientific Research. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, 1987.
Roudinesco, Élisabeth. Freud en su tiempo y en el. Madrid: Debate, 2014.
Simonsz, H. J. “Johannes Peter Müller’s First Description of the Relation Between Accommodation and Vergence, and of Accommodative Esotropia in 1826”. Strabismus 18, núm. 1. (2010): 1-2. https://doi: 10.3109/09273971003627310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09273971003627310
Stadler, Christian. “Aufstellungsarbeit von Träumen”. En C. Stadler y B. Kress (eds.), Praxishandbuch Aufstellungsarbeit. Grundlagen, Methodik und Anwendungsgebiete, 461-475. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17516-0_27
Stanley-Hall, Granville. “Letter to Freud, 4 November 1909”. En Sigmund Freud Papers: General Correspondence, 1871-1996; Hall, G. Stanley; Originals and miscellaneous photocopies, 1908-1913, 1909. https://bit.ly/3lcWwJE.
Stanley-Hall, Granville. “The Message of the Zeitgeist”. The Scientific Monthly 13, núm. 2 (1921): 106-116.
Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich. “Istoricheskii smysl krizisa v psikhologii”. Sobranie sochienlli (1927).
Wassmann, Claudia. “Physiological Optics, Cognition and Emotion: A Novel Look at the Early Work of Wilhelm Wundt”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 64 (2009): 213-249. https://doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrn058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrn058
Weneger, Mai. “Der psychophysische parrallelismus”. NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 17 (2009): 277-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-009-0344-3
Wundt, Wilhelm. Physikalischen Axiome un Ihre Beziehung zum Causalprincip. Erlangen: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, 1866.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundzüe der Physiologischen Psychologie, Leipzig, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1874.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Hipnotismus und Suggestion. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1892.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Lectures on Human and Animal Psychology. Leipzig: Swan Sonneschein & Co, 1894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12937-010
Wundt, Wilhelm. Völkerpsychologie Vol. 1. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1900.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Outlines of Psychology. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1902.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte [Folk Psychology. An Investigation of the Developmental Laws of Language, Myth, and Cutom]. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1906.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie Band I (6. Aufl.) [Basic Principles of Physiological Psychology Volume I (6th ed.)]. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1908.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie Band III (6. Aufl.) [Basic Principles of Physiological Psychology Volume III (6th ed.)]. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1911.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Grundriss der Psychologie (15. Aufl.) [Outlines of Psychology (15th ed.)]. Leipzig: Alfred Kröner Verlag, 1922.
Žižek, Slavoj. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock). London y New York: Verso, 1992.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Parallax View (Short Circuits). Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5231.001.0001
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.