Being a Patient as a Limit Category of Doctorhood: A Relational Account for Dehumanization in Medicine


Main Article Content

Marcia Villanueva


This article presents an analysis of physicians’ and patients’ identities drawing on Lindemann’s theory about the socio-narrative construction of identities. The main thesis is that patients’ identity is constructed as a counterpart to doctorhood. This refers to the professional identity of physicians, constituted by master narratives that represent these professionals as outstanding individuals, capable of performing heroic or even supernatural actions, sometimes even comparing them to gods and superheroes, which ultimately dehumanizes them. I use the notion of symbolic couple that Serret has proposed to analyze gender identities to argue that, in the doctor-patient binomial, the identity of the former is the masculinized central category and that of the latter is the feminized limit category, which is defined as the negation of doctorhood. The argument is illustrated with empirical data collected through ethnographic research. The article concludes that dehumanization in medicine is not merely the result of the subhuman characterizations that doctors make of patients, but rather refers to a relational phenomenon that operates under a patriarchal logic in which the dehumanization of patients appears as a counterpart to the dehumanization of doctors.

patient, doctorhood, doctor-patient relation, deshumanization in medicine, symbolic couple, identity

Ballesteros, Esmeralda. “Circulación de memes en WhatsApp: ambivalencias del humor desde la perspectiva de género”. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, núm. 35 (2016), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.35.2016.17167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.35.2016.17167

Bourke, Joanna. What it Means to be Human. Reflections from 1791 to the Present. Londres: Virago, 2011.

Butler, Judith. “Fundamentos contingentes: el feminismo y la cuestión del ‘postmodernismo’”, Revista de Estudios de Género La Ventana 2, núm. 13 (2001): 7-41.

Brown, Michael. “‘Like a Devoted Army’: Medicine, Heroic Masculinity, and the Military Paradigm in Victorian Britain”. Journal of British Studies 49, núm. 3 (2010): 592-622. https://doi.org/10.1086/652000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/652000

Brüggemann, Adrianus, Barbro Wijma y Katarina Swahnberg. “Abuse in Health Care: A Concept Analysis”. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 26, núm. 1 (2012): 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00918.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00918.x

Casal-Moros, Norma, y María Alemany-Anchel. “Violencia simbólica en la atención al parto, un acercamiento desde la perspectiva de Bourdieu”, Index de Enfermería, 23, núm. 1-2 (2014): 61-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962014000100013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962014000100013

Castro, Roberto. “La calidad de la atención como epifenómeno de la estructura del campo médico”. En De pacientes a exigentes. Un estudio sociológico sobre la calidad de la atención, derechos y ciudadanía en salud, ed. María del Carmen Castro Vázquez, 17-23. Hermosillo: El Colegio de Sonora, 2008.

Castro, Roberto. “Génesis y práctica del habitus médico autoritario en México”, Revista Mexicana de Sociología 76, núm. 2 (2014): 167-197.

Coyle, Joanne. “Exploring the Meaning of ‘Dissatisfaction’ with Health Care: The Importance of ‘Personal Identity Threat’”. Sociology of Health & Illness 21, núm. 1 (1999): 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00144

Downes, Stephen. “Human-computer Interaction: A Critical Synthesis: A Philosophical Ethnography of Human-computer Interaction Research”. Social Epistemology, núm. 1 (1987): 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728708578411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728708578411

Feinberg, Walter. “Philosophical Ethnography: Or, How Philosophy and Ethnography can Live Together in the World of Educational Research”. Educational Studies in Japan, núm. 1 (2006): 5-14. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.1.5

Gervais, Sarah (ed.). Objectification and (de) humanization. New York: Springer, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9

Haque, Omar, y Adam Waytz. “Dehumanization in Medicine: Causes, Solutions and Functions”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, núm. 2, (2012): 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429706

Haslam, Nick. “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review”. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, núm. 3 (2006), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4

Hinze, Susan. “Gender and the Body of Medicine or at Least Some Body Parts: (Re)Constructing the Prestige Hierarchy of Medical Specialties”. The Sociological Quarterly 40, núm. 2 (1999): 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00546.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00546.x

Izquierdo, María. “Lo que cuesta ser hombre: costes y beneficios de la masculinidad”. En Congreso SARE: “Masculinidad y vida cotidiana”. Donostia: EMAKUDE, 2007.

Lather, Patti. “(Post) Feminist Methodology: Getting Lost or a Scientificity We can Bear to Learn From”. International Review of Qualitative Research 1 (2008): 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2008.1.1.55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2008.1.1.55

Lifshitz, Alberto. La nueva clínica. Ciudad de México: Academia Nacional de Medicina, 2014.

Lindemann, Hilde. Holding and Letting Go: The Social Practice of Personal Identity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199754922.001.0001

Marson, Stephen, y Rasby Powell. “Goffman and the Infantilization of Elderly Persons: A Theory in Development”. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 41, núm. 4, (2014). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol41/iss4/8.

Pérez Salazar, Gabriel. El meme en Internet: identidad y usos sociales. Coahuila: Fontamara / Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, 2017.

Serret, Estela. “Hacia una redefinición de las identidades de género”. Géneros 18, núm. 9 (2011): 71-97.

Schechtman, Marya. “Locke and the Psychological Continuity Theorists”. En Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life, 10-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684878.003.0002

Shortell, Stephen. “Occupational Prestige Differences within the Medical and Allied Health Professions”. Social Science and Medicine 8, núm. 1 (1974): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90003-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90003-1

Swahnberg, Katarina, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert y Carina Berterö. “Nullified: Women’s Perceptions of Being Abused in Health Care”. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 28, núm. 3 (2007): 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820601143211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820601143211

Szaz, Thomas, y Marc Hollender. “A Contribution to the Philosophy of Medicine: The Basic Models of the Doctor-patient Relationship”. AMA Archives of Internal Medicine 97, núm. 5 (1956): 585-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1956.00250230079008

Villanueva, Marcia. “‘Somos médicos. No dioses’. La identidad médica frente a la pandemia de COVID-19”. En La vida emocional en la pandemia, eds. David Fajardo-Chica y Olbeth Hansberg, 77-101. Ciudad de México: UNAM, 2021.

Villanueva, Marcia. “Galendiad y masculinidad: semejanzas normativas, performativas y fenomenológicas”. Debate feminista. Aceptado para publicación en el volumen 67 (enero-junio 2024).

Villanueva, Marcia. “Medical Training as a Transformative Experience: An Analysis on Doctorhood to Question the Professional Identity Formation Paradigm”. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3, núm. 1 (2020): 415-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1754043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1754043

Villanueva, Marcia, “Por una conceptualización holista de la deshumanización de la medicina: Reflexiones a partir de la noción de persona”. En Atocha Aliseda, Cecilia Calderón y Marcia Villanueva. Filosofía de la medicina: discusiones y aportaciones desde México. Ciudad de México: UNAM, 2022.

Villanueva, Marcia. “Somos médicos, no dioses: Una etnografía filosófica sobre la deshumanización de la medicina”. Tesis del Doctorado en Filosofía de la Ciencia, UNAM, 2019.

Article Details

Villanueva, M. (2023). Being a Patient as a Limit Category of Doctorhood: A Relational Account for Dehumanization in Medicine. EN-CLAVES DEL PENSAMIENTO, (33), e608. https://doi.org/10.46530/ecdp.v0i33.608

Dossier

Marcia Villanueva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

MD from UNAM and winner of the Social Service Award “Dr. Gustavo Baz Prada” (2008). She has a master’s degree in Philosophy, Science and Values from the University of the Basque Country (2013), as well as a master's degree (2013) and PhD (2019) in Philosophy of Science from UNAM—the last two with honors. She completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the Regional Center for Multidisciplinary Research (CRIM) of UNAM (2021-2022). Since September 2022, she is a full-time Associate Researcher C at the Institute for Philosophical Research at UNAM. She belongs to the National System of Researchers level I. Her specialty area is Feminist Philosophy and Gender Studies, and she has competencies in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Medicine, and Bioethics.